† Corresponding author. E-mail:
The recently discovered two-dimensional (2D) layered material phosphorene has attracted considerable interest as a promising p-type semiconducting material. In this article, we review the recent advances in numerical studies of the thermal properties of monolayer phosphorene and phosphorene-based heterostructures. We first briefly review the commonly used first-principles and molecular dynamics (MD) approaches to evaluate the thermal conductivity and interfacial thermal resistance of 2D phosphorene. Principles of different steady-state and transient MD techniques have been elaborated on in detail. Next, we discuss the anisotropic thermal transport of phosphorene in zigzag and armchair chiral directions. Subsequently, the in-plane and cross-plane thermal transport in phosphorene-based heterostructures such as phosphorene/silicon and phosphorene/graphene is summarized. Finally, the numerical research in the field of thermal transport in 2D phosphorene is highlighted along with our perspective of potentials and opportunities of 2D phosphorenes in electronic applications such as photodetectors, field-effect transistors, lithium ion batteries, sodium ion batteries, and thermoelectric devices.
Phosphorene, a monolayer of phosphorus arranged in hinge-like hexagonal structures, has attracted increasing attention owing to its intriguing thermal,[1] electronical,[2–4] and optical properties.[5] The successful exfoliation of phosphorene from bulk black phosphorus has spurred tremendous research interest into this two-dimensional (2D) material since 2014.[6–8] Its unique structure and intriguing anisotropic properties are rarely found in other 2D materials. Being chemically and electronically active, its potential applications such as photodetectors,[9–12] field-effect transistors,[13–22] rechargeable batteries,[23–28] and thermoelectric devices[29–31] have also drawn growing research interest. Due to its ultrahigh surface/volume ratio and high chemical activity, pristine phosphorene has been shown to be a promising candidate for gas sensing.[32] It has been revealed that by adding anionic dopants such as O, C, and S atoms, a large cohesive energy and highly dispersive electronic states can be formed in doped phosphorene.[33] The band gap decreases by pushing down the conduction band, suggesting that the optical and electronic properties of the doped phosphorene can be tailored. Particularly, the metal doped phosphorene exhibits significantly enhanced chemical activity compared with pristine phosphorene, suggesting its great potentials in chemical applications such as materials growth, catalysis, gas sensing and storage. Moreover, due to the peculiar puckered structure of phosphorene, a negative Poissonʼs ratio is observed in the out-of-plane direction under uniaxial deformation in the direction parallel to the pucker. This phenomenon originates from the in-plane lattice puckered structure, together with coupled hinge-like bonding configurations, and has been confirmed by both numerical[34] and experimental[35] studies.
Besides pristine phosphorene, novel phosphorene-based heterostructures have also shown great potentials for electronic and optoelectronic applications. It has been found that many desirable electronic characteristics of phosphorene such as direct band gap and linear dichroism can be preserved in heterostructures such as phosphorene/graphene and phosphorene/hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) bilayers.[36] Graphene and h-BN sheets can be used as effective capping layers to protect phosphorene from structural and chemical degradations. Meanwhile, both sheets can also act as active layers to tune the carrier dynamics and optical properties of phosphorene. A recent study based on first-principles calculations by Gao et al.[37] has shown that the stability of phosphorene nanoflake is strongly dependent on the coupling strength between phosphorene and its substrate. For example, a strong interaction of 0.75 eV/P atom with copper substrate can break up the phosphorene structures, while a weak interaction of 0.063 eV/P atom with h-BN cannot stabilize phosphorene. However, it is reported that a moderate interaction strength of ∼0.35 eV/P atom is able to keep the 2D characteristics of phosphorene nanoflake on a realistic time scale. Therefore, in the study of phosphorene-based heterostructures, it is important to seek the optimum material and coupling strength to avoid the edge wrapping and reconstruction of phosphorene structures.
In this article, the state-of-the-art progress on the numerical studies of thermal transport properties of 2D phosphorene and phosphorene-based materials are reviewed, aiming to summarize the up-to-date results for this emerging material in the field of energy transport research. This review is organized as follows. First, the fundamental mechanisms and basic principles of different numerical methods for characterizing thermal conductivity (κ) and interfacial thermal resistance (R) are introduced. Next, detailed descriptions of the in-plane and out-of-plane thermal transport in phosphorene and phosphorene-based heterostructure materials are classified and highlighted, followed by a discussion of their potential applications in electronic devices such as photodetectors, field-effect transistors, lithium ion batteries, sodium ion batteries, and thermoelectric devices. Lastly, a summary of the numerical research in the field of thermal transport in 2D phosphorene is highlighted along with our perspective on its great potentials and opportunities in this research area.
Boltzmann transport equation (BTE) associated with the first-principles calculations have long been used to calculate the thermal conductivities of crystalline materials. The first-principles lattice thermal conductivity calculations for monolayer phosphorene start with the computation of interatomic force constants (IFCs) based on the density functional theory (DFT). Next, the dynamical matrices are used to solve the BTE with relaxation time approximation (RTA),[38] in which the lattice thermal conductivity is expressed as
Another numerical approach for thermal transport property characterization is the non-equilibrium Green function (NEGF) method, which can exactly deal with ballistic thermal transport and gives the maximum thermal conductance of a material.[49–51] When the system size of a nanomaterial is smaller than its phonon mean free path, the thermal transport can be regarded as ballistic, which can be described by the Landauer formula
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation is another powerful tool to treat thermal transport problems at micro/nanoscale. It intrinsically includes full anharmonicity in atomic interactions and does not make any assumptions on the thermodynamic limit. Since the description of atomic trajectories is achieved by numerically solving Newtonʼs equations of motion, the MD method can deal with thermal transport problems in systems containing millions of atoms. Therefore, MD simulations have been used in both thermal conductivity and interfacial thermal resistance research.[52–59] Tremendous efforts have been devoted to developing empirical interatomic potential (EIP) fields that can be adopted in MD simulation. One common strategy to develop an EIP is to first obtain the materials properties, e.g., crystal structure, cohesive energy, or phonon dispersion, from either first-principles calculations or experimental measurements, and then parameterize the potential by best fitting those properties.[60,61] Specific to the MD simulations in phosphorene, several types of EIPs have been developed to describe the P–P interactions. Jiang et al.[62] parameterized the Stillinger–Weber (SW) potential to describe the single layer phosphorene, which is expressed as[63]
The methods to characterize the thermal conductivity of phosphorene using MD simulations can be categorized into three groups, i.e., the steady-state equilibrium method, steady-state non-equilibrium method, and transient method. The equilibrium molecular dynamics (EMD) method is also referred to as the Green–Kubo method, which is given by the expression of heat current autocorrelation function (HCAF)[69]
Aside from the in-plane thermal conductivity, the cross-plane thermal contact resistance is also an important attribute often considered in thermal interface materials. As aforementioned, the NEMD method has been traditionally used to characterize the thermal conductivity of micro/nanostructures. Besides, the NEMD method has also been widely applied to calculate the interfacial thermal resistance between adjacent materials. After the hybrid system reaches thermal equilibrium, a heat flux is imposed on the system which will flow across the contact boundary. The temperature jump at the interface can be used to calculate the thermal contact resistance based on Fourierʼs law of heat conduction. However, if the 2D phosphorene is directly placed on the substrate, the NEMD method cannot be applied to calculate the interfacial thermal resistance between them. To build a steady-state temperature gradient in the substrate and across the interface, the heat reservoir needs to be placed directly on this phosphorene layer. In MD simulations, the temperatures are calculated according to the energy equipartition theorem
To remedy this problem, a transient method can be used to calculate the interfacial thermal resistance between supported phosphorene and substrate without measuring and controlling the temperature of phosphorene simultaneously. Basic principles of this method are illustrated as follows. First, temperature controls are applied to different components of the heterostructure to reach thermal equilibrium at steady-state. Then, an ultrafast thermal impulse is imposed on the phosphorene to elevate its temperature to a much higher value. In the meantime, the surface temperature of the substrate material can be considered as unchanged since the excitation time is very short. Next, in the thermal relaxation process, thermal energies in phosphorene will be gradually transferred to the substrate through heat conduction until the two systems have reached thermal equilibrium again. Since the only thermal pathway for heat dissipation is through heat conduction from phosphorene to substrate, the total energy variations of phosphorene can be correlated with the temperature evolutions in phosphorene and substrate surface, which is expressed as
The puckered atomic structures of monolayer phosphorene are shown in Figs.
The anisotropic thermal conductivity of phosphorene can be attributed to the discrepancies in the group velocities, which is possibly caused by the different atomic arrangements in the hinge-like structures of phosphorene.[94] The anisotropic thermal conductivity has also been reported in other hinge-like structures such as SnSe,[95] SnS, and arsenene.[96] Aside from the pronounced spatial-anisotropy of thermal conductivity in phosphorene, first-principles calculations also reveal that phosphorene possesses an anisotropic electrical conductance, i.e., the electronic conductivity along the armchair direction is much higher than that along the zigzag direction.[97] The prominent electrical and thermal conducting directions are orthogonal to each other, enhancing the thermoelectric figure of merit. Particularly, the prominent electronic conductivity combined with lowered thermal conductivity in the armchair direction indicates that the phosphorene nanoribbon might be a promising thermoelectric candidate.
The anisotropic thermal transport in phosphorene has been quantitatively assessed by several first-principles studies. By solving the BTE based on first-principles calculations, Qin et al.[91] calculated the anisotropic thermal conductivity of monolayer phosphorene at different temperatures. The predicted κ at 300 K in zigzag and armchair directions are
Aside from the aforementioned studies using first-principles calculations, MD simulations have also been performed to calculate the thermal conductivity of phosphorene. A recent study by Hong et al.[101] also confirmed that the thermal conductivity of phosphorene in the zigzag direction is much higher than that in the armchair direction. By using the NEMD method, the extrapolated thermal conductivities for infinite length phosphorene in zigzag and armchair directions equal
Although the existing numerical studies have mostly agreed that the thermal conductivity in phosphorene is highly anisotropic, however, some researchers have posed questions on this open topic. Using NEGF and first-principles method, Jiang et al.[103] investigated the thermal conductance for monolayer phosphorene in the ballistic transport regime. It is found that the anisotropy in the thermal conduction is very weak, with only 4% differences between armchair and zigzag directions. Detailed phonon dispersion calculations disclose that the ZA mode has lower group velocity in the direction perpendicular to the pucker, while the LA mode has higher group velocity in the perpendicular direction. This unusual phenomenon is attributed to the highly anisotropic Poisson ratio in phosphorene. As a result, the competition between these two opposite effects leads to the weak anisotropic thermal conductance for phosphorene.
Even though there are discrepancies in the calculated thermal conductivity of phosphorene at different chiral directions, it is affirmative that the in-plane thermal conductivity of phosphorene is about an order of magnitude smaller than that of graphene.[101] The significant thermal conductivity differences between phosphorene and graphene can be attributed to their different phonons behaviors in the out-of-plane direction. By examining the contributions of different phonon branches to the thermal conductivity, it is reported that the ZA phonons in phosphorene only contribute to ∼5% of the overall thermal conductivity, which is much lower than that of graphene.[91] Recent studies have shown that for a suspended single layer graphene, the ZA phonons can contribute up to 77% at 300 K and 86% at 100 K of the thermal conductivity due to its high specific heat and long phonon scattering time.[104] Besides, by numerically solving the phonon BTE, Lindsay et al.[88] came up with a symmetry-based selection rule which significantly restricts anharmonic phonon–phonon scattering of the ZA phonons, and they proved that κ of graphene is dominated by the ZA phonon modes. Hong et al.[101] compared the thermal conductivity differences between phosphorene and graphene. The overall and decomposed phonon density of states (PDOS) are calculated in both structures to elucidate their different phonon behaviors. The calculated results are shown in Fig.
It has been widely acknowledged that 2D phosphorene monolayers are chemically active and unstable when exposed to ambient environments.[108] Recent studies have shown that being placed on a substrate or sandwiched in matrix materials could greatly enhance its structural and thermal stability.[109] The thermal performance of these phosphorene-based heterostructures needs to be further investigated. The interfacial thermal transport between monolayer phosphorene and crystalline silicon substrate has been characterized by Zhang et al.[83] using the transient pump-probe method as aforementioned. Illustration of the pump-probe technique and schematic of the hybrid system setup are shown in Figs.
Lately, it was shown that stacking a graphene/phosphorene van der Waals (vdW) bilayer can preserve their properties in the ultimate heterostructure.[110] The relative position of phosphoreneʼs band structure with respect to grapheneʼs can be tuned via a vertical external electric field. Moreover, by exploring the electric field dependent band structures and optical properties of the graphene/phosphorene bilayer system, Hashmi et al.[111] demonstrated that the bilayer heterostructure can be applied to a high-speed device although the optical anisotropy in the bilayer structure for in-plane electric field polarization has disappeared. Due to the presence of the lone-pair state, monolayer phosphorene can be corrugated when in contact with common metal electrodes, which may degrade its performance. Conversely, graphene has excellent structural integrity with both metal electrodes and phosphorene due to its atomically smooth surface. Thus, graphene can serve as a perfect interfacial material between the phosphorene and metal electrodes.[36] Owing to the above reasons, thermal transport in graphene and phosphorene composed heterostructures have attracted tremendous research interests. Extensive MD simulations have been performed by Zhang et al.[112] to investigate the interfacial thermal transport in multilayer graphene/phosphorene/graphene heterostructures along the cross-plane direction. The hybrid system setup is shown in Fig.
Also using MD simulation method, Pei et al.[113] investigated the thermal stability and thermal conductivity of phosphorene in phosphorene/graphene heterostructures. It is found that when phosphorene is encapsulated in-between two graphene sheets, its thermal stability is enhanced significantly. The thermally stable temperature of phosphorene shows an increase of 150 K. However, no increase in the thermally stable temperature is observed when phosphorene is on a graphene sheet. Moreover, it was reported that the thermal conductivity of phosphorene in phosphorene/graphene heterostructures is much higher than that of a free-standing one. A net increase of 20%–60% in thermal conductivity is obtained from their simulations. The thermal conductivity alternations for pristine phosphorene, phosphorene/graphene bilayer, and graphene/phosphorene/graphene sandwiched structures are shown in Fig.
This paper offers an overview of recent numerical studies on the anisotropic thermal conductivity of phosphorene and the in-plane and cross-plane thermal transport in phosphorene-based materials. Due to their unique thermal and electrical characteristics, phosphorene-based materials can offer outstanding performance for various applications such as photodetectors, field-effect transistors, lithium ion batteries, sodium ion batteries, and thermoelectric devices. In spite of its great potential to be used in electronic and optoelectronic applications, challenges remain in the implementations of phosphorene in these devices. Due to its high surface area and volume ratio compared with bulk black phosphorus, its chemical and thermal stability is modified. In contrast to the 550 °C sublimation temperature of bulk phosphorus, the decomposition temperature of phosphorene is 400 °C.[108] Besides, a recent experimental study has shown that the volume of few layer phosphorene can be increased by 200% when exposed in ambient environments due to condensation of moisture from air.[116] Furthermore, long term exposure to ambient conditions can result in a layer-by-layer etching process in phosphorene flakes, which could transform few layer flakes into single layer phosphorene. In the time scale of a few minutes, a shift in the threshold voltage of phosphorene occurs due to the physisorbed oxygen and nitrogen. In longer time scales of hours, the p-type doping occurs from water adsorption. The electronic properties of phosphorene are quite sensitive to external turbulence due to its strong affinity of water molecules. An itinerant behavior of mono- and di-vacancies in phosphorene is observed at room temperature.[117] The mobility of a mono-vacancy is 16 orders faster than that in graphene, and its hopping rate in the zigzag direction is ∼3 orders higher than that in the armchair direction. The exceedingly high motilities of mono-vacancy and di-vacancies can be used to explain the relatively low structural stability and high affinity to environmental molecules in phosphorene. One possible way to suppress the oxidation of phosphorene in an ambient environment is to embed it in van der Waals heterostructures and apply a vertical electrical field. For example, Gao et al.[109] reported that phosphorene/MoSe2 heterostructure is able to reverse the stability of physisorption and chemisorption of O2 molecular on phosphorene. The application of a vertical electric field of −0.6 V/Å can further increase the oxidation energy barrier to 0.91 eV. However, the effectiveness of this method on prohibiting the adsorption of other molecules has not been verified. Despite the side effects caused by ambient environments, on the other hand, the nontrivial and distinct charge transfer occurring between phosphorene and physisorbed molecules makes it a promising candidate for gas sensor applications.[118] Due to the above mentioned reasons, further studies need to be undertaken to investigate the variations of the thermal transport in phosphorene with the existence of ambient molecular species such as H2O, CO, H2, NH3, NO, NO2, and O2. Also, it is important to further explore phosphorene-based heterostructures that can increase its chemical and structural stability in an ambient environment while preserving or enhancing its thermal performance. Since numerical approaches such as first-principles and molecular dynamics are more cost-effective and efficient compared to experimental studies in the field of heterostructure exploration and property probing, more efforts need to be made through numerical studies to obtain the properties of phosphorene-based compositions and to promote the usage of 2D phosphorene in future electronic applications.
[1] | |
[2] | |
[3] | |
[4] | |
[5] | |
[6] | |
[7] | |
[8] | |
[9] | |
[10] | |
[11] | |
[12] | |
[13] | |
[14] | |
[15] | |
[16] | |
[17] | |
[18] | |
[19] | |
[20] | |
[21] | |
[22] | |
[23] | |
[24] | |
[25] | |
[26] | |
[27] | |
[28] | |
[29] | |
[30] | |
[31] | |
[32] | |
[33] | |
[34] | |
[35] | |
[36] | |
[37] | |
[38] | |
[39] | |
[40] | |
[41] | |
[42] | |
[43] | |
[44] | |
[45] | |
[46] | |
[47] | |
[48] | |
[49] | |
[50] | |
[51] | |
[52] | |
[53] | |
[54] | |
[55] | |
[56] | |
[57] | |
[58] | |
[59] | |
[60] | |
[61] | |
[62] | |
[63] | |
[64] | |
[65] | |
[66] | |
[67] | |
[68] | |
[69] | |
[70] | |
[71] | |
[72] | |
[73] | |
[74] | |
[75] | |
[76] | |
[77] | |
[78] | |
[79] | |
[80] | |
[81] | |
[82] | |
[83] | |
[84] | |
[85] | |
[86] | |
[87] | |
[88] | |
[89] | |
[90] | |
[91] | |
[92] | |
[93] | |
[94] | |
[95] | |
[96] | |
[97] | |
[98] | |
[99] | |
[100] | |
[101] | |
[102] | |
[103] | |
[104] | |
[105] | |
[106] | |
[107] | |
[108] | |
[109] | |
[110] | |
[111] | |
[112] | |
[113] | |
[114] | |
[115] | |
[116] | |
[117] | |
[118] |